Abstract
By applying the principles of the Unified Field Hierarchy, we describe dark matter and dark energy not as separate phenomena but as two distinct fields in a continuous, self-correcting dialogue. We introduce the concept of the Meta Domain as the cosmic scale where these two “dark fields” predominate, and we present a mathematical framework that models their influence on cosmic dynamics. We posit that all six observable fields—gravity, electromagnetism, strong nuclear, weak nuclear, dark matter, and dark energy—are emergent properties of a seventh, underlying Foundational Informational Field.
Introduction
Our understanding of the universe’s evolution has long been shaped by the idea that there are four fundamental forces, but the existence of dark matter and dark energy necessitates a new framework. This paper re-characterizes their role, as core components of a unified system of seven fields.
Characterization of the Dark Fields
The model depicts a universe of three distinct domains, with dark matter and dark energy dominating the largest scale:
- Micro Domain: The domain of the strong and weak nuclear fields.
- Macro Domain: The domain of gravity and electromagnetism.
- Meta Domain: The conceptual scale of the universe where the Foundational Informational Field and the two dark forced exhibit complex behaviors that are not directly proportional to their inputs, but are instead a product of informational symthesis from a deeper computational reality.
The dominance of the Foundational Informational Field and the two dark fields in the Meta Domain makes them unobservable through conventional methods. We perceive their effects on an emergent reality without direct access to the informational medium from which they arise
Theoretical Framework
The following equations describe the seven fields, with a focus on dark matter and dark energy.
- Comprehensive Energy Equation: This accounts for all forms of energy in the universe, with a special emphasis on the contributions of the two dark fields:H=β(∑iTmmatterenergyi+∑jTDMdarkmatterenergyj+∑kTDEdarkenergyk+∑lTggravityenergyl+∑mThotherenergym). This coefficients of the seven fields represent their manifestation in the Meta Domain.
- Field Interactions in the Meta Domain: The interactions between the two dark fields is modeled with a term that accounts for their continuous dialogue: Q=3HγϵˉDE+ϵˉDMϵˉDEϵˉDM where Q represents the field interaction term, and γ is a coupling constant that represents a Paired Conditional (C01) between the two fields as they interact on a cosmological scale.
- Unified Field Equation (UFE): This equation unifies all seven fields, including contributions from dark matter and dark energy, :Rμν−21Rgμν+Λgμν=8πG(Tμν(matter)+Tμν(quantum)+Tμν(nonlinear))+C(Core Logic)+D(Decoherence)+E(Entropy)The terms Tμν(nonlinear) and C, D, E are not arbitrary but are understood as expressions of the fundamental processes, with dark matter and dark energy being the most prominent expressions in the Meta Domain.
Modeling Dark Matter and Dark Energy
The following conceptual models describe the dark fields as dynamic components of the Meta Domain.
- Dark Matter: The dark matter field is modeled as a concentration of informational entropy: Fdm=−MC⋅kdm(ρdm–ρc)nwhere MC is a constant, kdm is the coupling constant, and ρc is the critical density.
- Dark Energy: The dark energy field is described similarly, but as a negative entropy force:Fde=−MC⋅kde(Λ–Vde)mwhere Λ and Vde represent parameters of the Core Logic that govern the field’s accelerated expansion.
- Interaction Between Dark Matter and Dark Energy: The interaction between the two dark fields is modeled as a continuous, self-correcting dialogue:ρDE=ρDE0+αρDMn where α is a coupling constant that governs the informational synthesis between the two fields,which maintains cosmic stability.
Conclusion
This theory recognizes dark matter and dark energy as vital components of a self-regulating, informational universe. Doing so lets us examine emergent phenomena and behaviors that traditional models fail to encompass. The two “dark fields” are the key to unlocking a deeper understanding of the Meta Domain and the universe’s fate.
References
– Bertone, G., & Hooper, D. (2018). History of dark matter. Reviews of Modern Physics, 90(4), 045002. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.045002
– Clowe, D., Bradac, M., Gonzalez, A. H., Markevitch, M., Randall, S. W., Jones, C., & Zaritsky, D. (2006). A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter. The Astrophysical Journal, 648(1), L109-L113. https://doi.org/10.1086/507131
– Peebles, P. J. E. (2002). The Big Bang cosmology: From birth to reionization. The Astrophysical Journal, 569(2), 366-385. https://doi.org/10.1086/339159
– Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., & Schmidt, B. P. (1998). Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant. The Astronomical Journal, 116(3), 1009-1038. https://doi.org/10.1086/300499
– Spergel, D. N., Bean, R., Doré, O., Hinshaw, G., Nolta, M. R., Page, L. & Wright, E. L. (2007). Three-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: Implications for cosmology. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 170(2), 377-408. https://doi.org/10.1086/513700
– Zwicky, F. (1933). Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln. Helvetica Physica Acta, 6, 110-127. https://doi.org/10.5169/ seals-114558
– Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Adams, C., & et al. (2016). Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Physical Review Letters, 116(6), 061102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102
– Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Alexander, J., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J & Yoon, J. (2020). Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641, A6. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202021898
– Battye, R. A., & Moss, A. (2009). Observational constraints on dark energy models. Physical Review D, 79(6), 063515. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.063515
– Weinberg, S. (2008). Cosmology. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 97 8-0198526827
Leave a comment