NO OTHERNESS

Abstract

The Theory of Quantum Points proposes that spacetime is quantized into discrete tetrahedral structures at the Planck scale. This resolves critical issues in traditional models of general relativity, such as infinite density, the transition from quantum to classical behavior, and the black hole information paradox, by yielding new concepts of extreme gravitational phenomena and the stable dynamics of black holes. By embedding tetrahedral geometry into the quantum structure of spacetime, it redefines singularities, black holes, and cosmic evolution. We extend this geometric foundation through Quantum Contextual Probability (QCP), introducing a Unified Constants Equation (UCE) that connects physical constants (e.g.,  (\alpha, G, \hbar)(α,G,ℏ)) and mathematical constants (e.g., (\pi, e)(π,e)) as context-dependent entities governed by a scalar field (\phi (ϕ) and an effective parameter (\theta_{\text{eff}} = \theta + f(\phi))(θeff​=θ+f(ϕ)). The framework introduces a Unification Constant (\beta = e^{-2 \log(\alpha_0)} (e / \hbar)^3)(β=e−2log(α0​)(e/ℏ)3) that links geometry, quantum dynamics, and information theory. Together these theories yield a self-consistent, quantized model of spacetime, constant variability, and cosmological evolution.

Introduction

The quest to understand spacetime has long been central to theoretical physics. Traditional models, particularly general relativity, provide profound insight into gravitation and cosmic geometry but encounter problems at singularities and in reconciling quantum phenomena. The concept of quantum points resolves issues related to infinite density and singularities, presenting a new perspective on cosmic evolution, the dynamics of black holes, and the relationship between the quantum and classical realms.

The Theory of Quantum Points (TQP) resolves these by proposing that spacetime consists of discrete tetrahedral “quantum points.” This model extends the idea that triangles are the simplest 2D foundational elements of physical and abstract systems (as proposed in the Theory of Triangular Cosmology) to suggest that the fundamental 3D units of spacetime are tetrahedra. These quantum points form the granular structure from which curvature, mass, and time emerge. Simultaneously, Quantum Contextual Probability (QCP) extends the probabilistic foundation of quantum mechanics to constants themselves. Both physical and mathematical constants are treated as contextual observables dependent on the underlying scalar field (\phi)(ϕ).

Together, TQP and QCP describe a contextually geometric universe—one in which geometry, constants, and quantum probability are facets of the same dynamic structure.

Tetrahedral Geometry and the Quantization of Spacetime

Triangles are the simplest two-dimensional elements and the building blocks of higher-dimensional order. Extending this logic, the universe’s fundamental three-dimensional units are tetrahedra, each composed of four triangular faces. At the Planck scale, spacetime is discretized into tetrahedral quantum points, each forming a quantum cell for gravitational and field interactions. The discrete geometry is represented as:

[D_{pq} \sim \frac{l_P^2}{l_{qc}^2} \cdot \frac{4\sqrt{2}}{3}]

Where :

( D_{pq} )(Dpq​) represents the discrete geometric interval, 
( l_P )(lP​) the Planck length, and 
( l_{qc} )(lqc​) the characteristic quantum condition.

1. The Centroid as the Quantum Reference Point
Each tetrahedron possesses a centroid, the mean position of its four vertices:

[\vec{C} = \frac{1}{4}(\vec{A} + \vec{B} + \vec{C} + \vec{D})]

In TQP, this centroid represents the quantum reference origin of each spacetime cell — the point where gravitational and quantum potentials balance.

Centroid-to-centroid separations define a discrete metric tensor field:

[g_{\mu\nu}^{(discrete)} \approx \sum_{i,j} \langle \vec{C}_i – \vec{C}_j \rangle^2]

As these centroids interact and tessellate, a smooth macroscopic metric ( g_{\mu\nu} )(gμν​) emerges in the continuum limit. The centroid thus becomes the Planck-scale node where quantum geometry and probability unify.

2. Quantum Fluctuations and Matter Dynamics
In this framework, what were formerly perceived as singularities are now understood as regions with finite densities governed by quantum effects that are tied to tetrahedral structures. These fluctuations, driven by the exchange of gravitons, regulate conditions that would otherwise lead to singularities. Within each tetrahedral unit, quantum fluctuations occur along its edges, regulated by graviton exchange. The Schrödinger-like equation for matter in extreme gravitational regions is:
[i\hbar \frac{\partial \psi(x,t)}{\partial t} = H \psi(x,t) + \frac{\hbar^2}{2m_0} \nabla^2 \psi(x,t)]

Matter is thus modulated by local tetrahedral geometry and centroidal fields, producing finite densities that replace classical singularities.

3. Gravitational and Quantum Corrections
Energy and potential are modified to include quantum corrections:
[E^2 = (pc)^2 + (m_0 c^2)^2 + \frac{\hbar^2}{m_0 c^2} \nabla^2 \psi(x)]
[V(x) = -G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r} + \frac{\hbar}{4\pi r} \left( \nabla^2 \psi(x) \right)]

These corrections ensure finite curvature and stable densities, resolving the singularity problem and introducing discrete corrections to general relativity.

4. Tetrahedral Volume and Cosmic Evolution
The volume of a fundamental tetrahedron is:
[V_{\text{tetra}} = \frac{a^3 \sqrt{2}}{12}]

Where  ( a )(a) is the edge length.

This volume serves as a quantum volumetric unit — the minimal spacetime element from which cosmic expansion, entropy, and curvature arise. Each tetrahedron divides into four smaller tetrahedra through its centroid, symbolizing a self-similar cosmological expansion mechanism without singular origin, consistent with an energetic tetrahedral genesis rather than a pointlike Big Bang.

5. Nonlinear Transition Dynamics
The abrupt quantum-to-classical transition is represented by the Unfolding Equation:

J_n = T(J_{n-1}, \theta, \sigma, r) = 10^{\lambda_n}(2^{\omega(n)} – 2) \cdot V(T_{\text{tetra}})Jn​=T(Jn−1​,θ,σ,r)=10λn​(2ω(n)−2)⋅V(Ttetra​)

The transition from quantum behavior to classical reality is fundamentally abrupt and nonlinear. Energy states switch rapidly because of the dynamics dictated by the tetrahedral structure. This describes discrete energy-state jumps, with ( V(T_{\text{tetra}}) )(V(Ttetra​)) linking quantum fluctuations to macroscopic observables through nonlinear emergence.

Quantum Contextual Probability and Constant Variability

1. Context-Dependent Constants

All constants are contextually modulated by a scalar field  (\phi)(ϕ), leading to:[\theta_{\text{eff}} = \theta + f(\phi)]

Each constant  ( X )(X) follows a probability distribution (\mathcal{P}(X | C(\phi)))(P(X∣C(ϕ))), where  ( C(\phi) )(C(ϕ)) defines the contextual vacuum state.

Decoherence of this field yields locally stable “fixed” constants, whose measured values are classical limits of quantum variability.

2. Unified Constants Equation (UCE)
A dimensionally consistent interrelation of constants is expressed as:
[\mathbf{C}{\text{uni}}’ = c^{\alpha_1} G^{\alpha_2} \hbar^{\alpha_3} e^{\alpha_4} \beta^{\alpha_5} m_e^{\alpha_6} u^{\alpha_7} \varepsilon_0^{\alpha_8} (1 + h(\theta{\text{eff}}))]

Here, ( h(\theta_{\text{eff}}) )(h(θeff​)) introduces the dynamic contextual term linking geometry and field.

3. The Unification Constant 
(\beta)(β) [\beta = e^{-2 \log(\alpha_0)} \left( \frac{e}{\hbar} \right)^3]

This parameter integrates the fine-structure constant  (\alpha_0)(α0​), Planck’s constant, and Euler’s number into one coupling constant — entangling physical and mathematical constants through tetrahedral geometry and quantum field interactions.

4. The Unification Equation
[Z = \beta K \cdot \alpha_d V_{\text{tetra}} e^{\gamma(C)} \lambda_n] where ( e^{\gamma(C)} )(eγ(C)) incorporates centroid-dependent corrections.

This expresses the contextual unification of all constants and geometries, with the centroid’s curvature balance serving as the quantum–geometric coupling point.

Parameter Definitions for the Unification Equation:

– ZZ: A dimensionless unification parameter representing the combined effect of constants governing quantum and geometric interactions.
– \betaβ: A strong coupling constant, reflecting the interaction strength at the tetrahedral quantum scale.
– KK: A fundamental proportionality constant, potentially related to Planck-scale parameters or normalization factors.
– \alpha_dαd​: A dimensionless fine-structure-like constant associated with the discretized geometric structure—akin to the fine-structure constant but extended to quantum tetrahedral geometry.
– V_{\text{tetra}}Vtetra​: The volume of a fundamental tetrahedral quantum point.
– e^{\gamma}eγ: An exponential factor incorporating a dimensionless constant \gammaγ, possibly representing quantum correction factors or scaling effects.
– \lambda_nλn​: A hierarchy parameter, reflecting the scale-dependent hierarchy of quantum states or energy levels.

Energetics, Entropy, and the Arrow of Time

1. Comprehensive Energy Equation (CEE):

The Comprehensive Energy Equation is augmented to depict the interactions between time, energy, and all matter forms:

[H = \sum_{i=\text{matter}} T_m + \sum_{j=\text{dark}} T_{\text{DM}} + \sum_{k=\text{dark}} T_{\text{DE}} + \sum_{l=\text{gravity}} T_g + \sum_{m=\text{other}} T_h + \frac{1}{2} \sum_{n} \hbar \omega_n]

2. Unified Entropy Equation (UEE):

[S_{\text{total}}(t) = S_{\text{quantum}}(t) + S_{\text{macro}}(t) + S_{\text{cosmo}}(t) + S_{\text{info}}(t)]

3. Cosmic Acceleration and the Arrow of Time:
The directional nature of time, which is intrinsically connected to thermodynamic entropy, manifests through cosmic evolution, governed by:

[\ddot{a}(t) = -\frac{4\pi G}{3}(\rho(t) + \frac{3p(t)}{c^2})a(t) + \frac{\Lambda c^2}{3} a(t) + \text{Higher-Dimensional Terms}]

Entropy and time direction emerge from centroidal expansion and field decoherence, tying the arrow of time to information flow through quantum–geometric units.

Theoretical and Observational Implications

– No Singularities: Finite quantum tetrahedral densities replace singular cores. The effective density is a stable quantum state: 
[\rho_A = \rho_Q + \rho_R + \alpha P(x) – V(x)][ρA​=ρQ​+ρR​+αP(x)−V(x)]
– Black Holes: Rather than endpoints of gravitational collapse, black holes manifest as complex quantum tetrahedral states that are sustained by quantum effects, preserving information incorporated into their structure.
– Cosmic Evolution: Expansion is driven by centroidal divergence within the tetrahedral lattice, implying that the universe did not arise from a singularity but reflects an emergent order from the interactions of quantum tetrahedra.
– Interactions Between Quantum and Classical Regimes: Tetrahedral geometry fosters a framework for transitions between quantum and classical realms, with properties manifesting as they scale beyond the Planck level.
– Constant Variation: Observed variability of  (\alpha)(α) and (G)(G) reflects local scalar-field contexts.
– A New View of Constants: The Unification Equation indicates possible dependencies among constants like \alpha_dαd​, \betaβ, and  \lambda_nλn​, potentially reducing the number of truly fundamental parameters to two. The geometric foundation, V_{\text{tetra}}Vtetra​, links constants directly to the discrete structure of spacetime, emphasizing geometry’s role.

Experimental Tests:
– Quasar spectra for (\Delta\alpha/\alpha)(Δα/α)
– Neutrino oscillations for (\theta_{\text{eff}})(θeff​) shifts
– Gravitational wave signatures of (G)(G)-variation

Conclusion

The Theory of Quantum Points presents a transformational paradigm in the study of spacetime, constants, and information. Spacetime emerges from discrete tetrahedral quantum points whose centroids define the nodes of reality, and physical and mathematical constants become contextual observables modulated by scalar-field dynamics. This synthesis replaces singularities with stable geometric quantum states, explains fine-tuning through contextual interdependence, and positions geometry as the origin of both physical law and numerical truth.

References

Bianchi, E., & Rovelli, C. (2010). Canonical quantum gravity. In J. B. Barbour & H. Pfister (Eds.), The Philosophy of Cosmology (pp. 123-137). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976621.011
Carroll, S. M. (2019). Spacetime and geometry: An introduction to general relativity (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley.
Hawking, S. W., & Penrose, R. (1996). The nature of space and time. Princeton University Press.
Lemos, J. P. S., & Santos, N. (2003). The black hole entropy and the holographic principle. Physical Review D, 68(8), 084020. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.084020
Rovelli, C. (2004). Quantum gravity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755779